Varför systran(eller babelfish för den delen) inte skulle duga för att skriva en blogg:
Detta är en Systranversion av mitt omdebbatterade inlägg om vänsterpartiet:
Doubt darken my otherwise so clear sky… I has of course long speculated if I lie more at anarchy pcs - or kommunisthållet, but in which case steadied Vänsterpariet. I am not equally safe longer… Left Party feel to do many good gadgets, and I amuse with them most thing questions, but they are not socialister. I has all the time known that one not could demand that Sweden would have one kommunistiskt batch, but I have at closer study come until that we not even has one socialistiskt. Left Party feel fights for socialistiska ideal, but their economic policy is actually social Fascist (what happens to last what their utbrytargrupp KFML (r) farmed cold S for). But [on the other hand] can one of course intend “I see, and what damn means it?”. Yes, sow here is it: Socialismen builds of course on egalitarism precise as the anarchism, libertarianismen and to certain degree socialliberalismen. Egalitarism is according to Wikipedia: “a political doctrine that means that all people will be treated as likar from the birth”. This does not agree agreed with the idea that one would broaden the power at a State that builds on representation, whose representative nature in it is diskutabel. This is the State that in socialistisk terminology is called “borgarstaten”. It is consulted of course clearly on the name that it is not socialistisk. One socialist wants to instead rough against the drawing-up of “arbetarstaten” or “proletariatets dictatorship” that it is called in kommunistisk terminology.This is a State where the people govern, not entrepreneurs, politicians and miscellaneous others “representatives”. Where one goes from there depends on who man is. One marknads-socialist lets since the free market's nycker samspela with arbetarstatens decisions, while one råds-socialist lets it to flow on as until, permanent without företagsägare, and instead different trade-unions that together constitute carried out boards, while one kommunist tries to do itself of with also this State as soon as as possible. Swedish Social Democratic Party were marknads-socialister once in the time, although they now is socialliberaler, while Vp in principle always has been socialfascister apart from a part of VPK-eran then they sometimes abutted to common irreproachable fascism. With socialfascism means I a mould of fascism where one tries to pursue with little socialistiska ideal in the concept. Some examples on this is Sovjet, China and Cuba. One must however remember that the relation between fascism and socialism in a social Fascist area can vary hugely a lot. I consider that Vp: s social policy is it most anti-fascistiska in Sweden, however is their economic among the most Fascist, although they have good intentions. Set this in contrast to Sovjet and China, there socialismen övermannade fascismen only in retoriken. Self-evident had they socialistiska features. In Sovjet was of course läskunnigheten big, and in China has the work for increased equality long been highly prioritized, but everything such is only experiments to passing as socialister, while Vp of course only has forgotten away what socialism meant purely financially in all that social struggle that self-evidently also is important and that is the central reason to that I support them. I do not want to to seem as one sekterist that complains on all other on the left edge and only want to have “my way or the highway”. I steady Vp in it parlamentariska the area of the policy, what I accommodate big hopes for although neither them can be met with the prevailing sight on the State. I am bl.a member in young left of this just reason, I want to have a role where I latter can to influence the batch, since it is that only batch that actual want to last socialistiskt.It is that only batch that does not think that Stalins interpretation is it only correct (Socialdemokraterna does not be called as they do in order to it is a correct ideology, without in order to the idiots believe that proletariatets dictatorship is a correct dictatorship and want to take avständ from this), and it only ideologiska batch that wants to legal ice era pirate duplication and has opposed National Defence Radio Establishment already from the start (with ideologisk wants to I to eliminate ekologister and piratister). In other word, I wanted to with this text not to deter you from voting on Vp, since they nevertheless is it most socialistiska batch we have in Sweden, without wanted only to arouse thoughts among your other vänsterpartister (and socialister et.c.), and perhaps few one and other social democrat to realize that the on certain ways stands right about Moddarna.
Jag ville här uppvisa hur absurt det vore att påstå att man skulle kunna föra en diskussion eller att debattera via översättningar. Jag har fått höra att en del av mina facebook-vänner tvekar på huruvida jag verkligen bor i Sverige. Den störste skeptikern har blivit ombedd att läsa min blogg, så jag tänkte att jag skulle bevisa hur skrattretande hans tvekan är, iom det faktum att jag har fört en konversation med honom på svenska via chatt.
Som sagt, alla som vill att jag ska ta upp något särskilt ämne, jag gör det med glädje ^^
Tycker att du gjorde onlineöversättningarna orättvisa genom att välja en tjänst som inte verkar hålla särskilt hög standard i jämförelse med de jag är van vid. För jämförelse så kan du läsa googles översättning av ditt blogginlägg: state0=" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdabuz.blogg.se%2F2008%2Fnovember%2Futkast-tvivel-formorkar.html&sl=sv&tl=en&historystate0=
Tycker att du gjorde onlineöversättningarna orättvisa genom att välja en tjänst som inte verkar hålla särskilt hög standard i jämförelse med de jag är van vid. För jämförelse så kan du läsa googles översättning av ditt blogginlägg: state0=" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdabuz.blogg.se%2F2008%2Fnovember%2Futkast-tvivel-formorkar.html&sl=sv&tl=en&historystate0=
Oj, förlåt att det råkade bli dubbelpost, men bogg.se verkar ogilla att jag använder akregator för att kommentera.
Den var bättre, dock inte mycket bättre:
"Doubts obscuring my otherwise clear sky ... I have long wondered if I is more to the anarchist-communist or direction, but in all cases supported the Left Parietaria. I am not so sure anymore ... The Left Party will have to do a lot of good stuff, and I agree with those of most issues, but they are not socialists. I have always known that one could not ask for Sweden would have a Communist party, but I have been in closer study found that we did not even have a socialist. The Left Party may fight for socialist ideals, but their economic policies are actually social fascist (which happens to be what their SPLINTER KFML (r) used to call S). But then one can imagine "Oh, what the hell does that mean?". Well, here it is:
Socialism is based on egalitarism just as anarchism, Libertarianism, and to some degree of social liberalism. Egalitarism is under Wikipedia: "a political doctrine which says that all people should be treated as equals from birth." This is not consistent with the idea that it would extend the power of a state based on representation, whose representative nature in itself is questionable. This is the state of the socialist terminology called "castles State". There is clearly the name that is not socialist. A socialist wants to work towards the establishment of "working state" or the "proletariat dictatorship" as it is called in communist terminology. This is a state where the people govern, not entrepreneurs, politicians and various other "representatives".
Where to go from there depends on who you are. A market-socialist then let the free market's whims interact with the work State's decision, while a Council-socialist allowing it to float on as before, without the business owners, and instead various trade unions which together represent corporate boards, while a communist trying to get rid of even this State as soon as possible. SAP was the market-socialists in the past, although they now are social liberals, while Vp in principle has always been social fascists apart from some of Vpk era when the sometimes limited to ordinary decent fascism.
With social fascism, I mean a form of fascism which seeks to bring a little socialist ideals of the concept. Some examples are the Soviet Union, China and Cuba. However we must remember that the relationship between fascism and socialism in a social fascist arm can vary greatly. I believe that the Vp's social policy is the most anti-fascist in Sweden, however, is their economic among the most fascist, even if they have good intentions. Put this in contrast to the Soviet and China, where socialism overwhelmed fascism only in rhetoric. Obviously, the Socialist draft. In the Soviet literacy was high, and in China, work for greater equality long been a high priority, but all this is just try to pass as socialists, while Vp is only to have forgotten what socialism meant purely economic in all the social struggle that of course, also is important and that is the main reason why I support them.
I do not want to look like a SECTARIAN who complain about all the other left-wing and just wants "my way or the highway". I support Vp in the parliamentary branch of policy, which I have high hopes for even if none of them can be satisfied with the current perception of the state. I am including member of the Young Left for this very reason, I want a role where I later can affect the party, because it is the only party that actually wants to be socialist. It is the only party that does not believe that Stalin's interpretation is the only correct (Social Democrats units do not they do that it is a real ideology, but because the idiots think that the proletariat dictatorship is a real dictatorship and want to distance myself from this); and the only ideological party that wants to legalize piracy and has opposed the FRA from the start (with ideological, I would like to exclude ecology ster and pirated lard). In other words, I wanted to with this text does not deter you from voting on Vp, because they still are the most socialist party we have in Sweden, but just wanted to raise ideas among your second Left (and socialists etc.), and perhaps receive a social democrat and the other to realize that in some ways stands to the right of slush shares."
